Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 31;9:671–680. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S52713

Table 1.

Statistics for the regression analyses of lipid values versus cardiovascular eventsa

Triglycerides
HDL-C
Total cholesterolb
LDL-C
Slope P-value Slope P-value Slope P-value Slope P-value
All studies (N=40) 0.488 0.005 0.085 0.822 1.030 <0.001 0.624 <0.001
Population (N=36)c
 Primary prevention (N=11) 1.031 0.010 2.251 0.223 1.232 0.044 0.932 0.002
 Secondary prevention (N=25) 0.373 0.114 −0.288 0.487 1.264 <0.001 0.507 <0.001
HDL-C level (N=40)
 Low (N=20) 0.605 0.013 0.127 0.773 1.294 <0.001 0.539 <0.001
 High (N=20) 0.624 0.018 0.719 0.367 0.602 0.041 0.776 <0.001
LDL-C level (N=40)
 Low (N=20) 0.765 0.010 0.252 0.625 0.952 <0.001 0.585 <0.001
 High (N=20) 0.352 0.136 −0.460 0.497 1.392 <0.001 0.888 <0.001
Total cholesterol level (n=38)b
 Low (N=19) 0.765 0.005 −1.575 0.023 0.844 <0.001 0.594 <0.001
 High (N=19) 0.456 0.107 0.455 0.502 1.475 <0.001 1.026 <0.001

Notes:

a

Bold font indicates statistical significance at P<0.05

b

JUPITER and AIM-HIGH, which did not report total cholesterol, were omitted from analyses of total cholesterol

c

the analyses omitted the four trials with mixed primary and secondary populations.

Abbreviations: AIM-HIGH, Atherothrombosis Intervention in Metabolic syndrome with low HDL/High triglycerides: Impact on Global Health outcomes; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; JUPITER, Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.