Table 3.
Most variable residues within gC1q identified by ConSurf
| ghA | ghB | ghC | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ● PRO2 | 102 | ●ASN2 | 104 | ● HIS 2 | 101 |
| 2 | ● MET1 | 104 | ● PRO 2 | 106 | ● PRO 2 | 103 |
| 3 | ●GLY2 | 105 | ● ARG 1 | 108 | ● ALA 1 | 105 |
| 4 | ILE 1 | 110 | ● ARG 1 | 109 | ● PRO 1 | 106 |
| 5 | ○GLN1 | 118 | ARG 1 ★ | 114 | ●SER2 | 108 |
| 6 | ○GLU2 | 120 | MET 1 | 122 | ● ARG 1 | 111 |
| 7 | HIS 2 | 125 | ARG 2 ★ | 129 | ○ PRO 1 | 119 |
| 8 | THR1 | 132 | LYS 2 | 136 | ○GLY2 | 121 |
| 9 | GLN1 | 146 | ARG 1 | 150 | SER2 | 126 |
| 10 | SER2 | 152 | ●GLU1★ | 162 | LYS 1 | 133 |
| 11 | ● ARG 1 | 158 | ● ALA 1 | 164 | THR1 | 147 |
| 12 | ● VAL 1 | 161 | ● LYS 2 | 166 | LEU 2 | 153 |
| 13 | ● ARG 1 | 163 | CYS 2 | 171 | VAL 1 | 159 |
| 14 | CYS 1 | 168 | ● TYR 1 ◀ | 175 | ● CYS 1 | 165 |
| 15 | ASN1 | 172 | ●PHE2 | 178 | ●SER1 | 169 |
| 16 | ●GLN2 | 186 | ○ LYS 2 | 188 | ●ASN2 | 172 |
| 17 | ●GLN1 | 188 | ○GLU1 | 190 | ○ ARG 1 | 182 |
| 18 | ●GLN1 | 189 | ○GLN1 | 191 | ○GLN1 | 184 |
| 19 | ○ PRO 1 | 199 | ●ASP1 | 201 | ○ VAL 1 | 185 |
| 20 | ○ LYS 1 ◀ | 200 | ● LYS 1 | 202 | ●ASP1 | 195 |
| 21 | ○ HIS 1 | 203 | ○ MET 1 | 208 | ● TYR 1 | 196 |
| 22 | SER1 | 208 | ○GLU2 | 209 | ○GLY2 | 201 |
| 23 | ○GLY1 | 210 | ○ ILE 1 | 202 | ||
| 24 | ○GLN2 | 203 | ||||
| 25 | ○GLY1 | 204 |
(★) Residues known to be involved in IgG binding; (◀) residues proposed to be involved in CRP binding. Residues are sorted on the basis of position. (●) and (○) indicate possible important residue clusters for ligand binding. Clusters are defined wherever residues are at/within 3-residue distance from each other. Hydrophobic and ring residues are underlined. Arginine and lysine residues are shown in boldface. Numbers in superscript indicate the “rank” of the residue given by ConSurf (1–9, most variable to most conserved, see also Fig. 2). The most variable residues (ranks 1 and 2) are shown here. Only the gC1q domain was used in the analysis.