Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 5;8(11):e79807. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079807

Table 2. Genetic diversity estimates for sampled population of Solanum rostratum in China, the U.S.A. and Mexico.

Region and Population N P Na (range) Ne (± S.E.) Allelic richness HO HE FIS FSTAT Private Alleles
China
BC 24 0.60 1.90 (1–3) 1.39 (±0.16) 1.89 0.10 0.21 0.521*** 1
CY 23 1.00 2.60 (2–4) 1.84 (±0.15) 2.60 0.36 0.42 0.174** 0
WSL 24 1.00 2.70 (2–5) 1.72 (±0.17) 2.69 0.28 0.37 0.280*** 1
MY 24 1.00 2.80 (2–5) 1.65 (±0.14) 2.75 0.35 0.35 0.023 1
TZ 24 0.90 2.30 (1–3) 1.60 (±0.15) 2.28 0.28 0.32 0.164* 0
Mean ± SE 23.8 ± 0.20 0.90 ± 0.08 2.9 ± 0.16 1.6 ± 0.17 2.44± 0.16 0.27 ± 0.04 0.39 ± 0.04 0.6 ± 0.25
U.S.A.
HAY 24 1.00 2.90 (2–5) 1.90 (±0.11) 2.89 0.27 0.46 0.433*** 0
BOT 24 1.00 3.10 (2–5) 1.92 (±0.12) 3.09 0.42 0.45 0.104* 1
ROL 24 1.00 2.80 (2–6) 1.79 (±0.27) 2.79 0.22 0.36 0.415*** 0
CHE 24 1.00 3.20 (2–7) 1.88 (±0.27) 3.18 0.29 0.4 0.303*** 3
WIC 24 0.90 2.70 (1–6) 1.89 (±0.29) 2.69 0.29 0.39 0.269*** 1
Mean ± SE 24 ± 0 0.98 ± 0.02 3.4 ± 0.09 1.9±0.10 2.93 ± 0.09 0.30 ± 0.03 0.45 ± 0.02 1.0 ± 0.55
Mexico
VDU 19 1.00 4.10 (2–6) 2.39 (±0.26) 3.49 0.36 0.55 0.371*** 7
SLP 15 0.90 4.00 (1–8) 2.24 (±0.22) 3.5 0.44 0.51 0.165** 4
SLG 22 1.00 4.70 (3–6) 2.54 (±0.33) 3.89 0.40 0.56 0.303*** 5
QSJ 16 0.90 3.80 (1–8) 2.14 (±0.36) 3.12 0.40 0.44 0.124* 4
TEM 18 1.00 3.90 (2–8) 2.27 (±0.44) 3.42 0.40 0.45 0.137** 4
Mean ± SE 18 ± 1.22 0.98 ± 0.02 4.60 ± 0.16 2.30 ± 0.16 3.48 ± 0.12 0.39 ± 0.01 0.53 ± 0.02 4.80 ± 0.58
Grand Mean ± S.E. 21.93±0.84 0.95±0.03 3.17±0.20 1.94±0.08 2.95±0.13 0.32 ±0.02 0.42±0.02 2.20±0.56

N = number of individuals successfully genotyped; P = Proportion of polymorphic loci; N a = Average number of alleles per locus; Ne= Average number of effective alleles per locus; R s = Allelic richness averaged across loci; H O = Observed heterozygosity averaged across loci; H E = Expected heterozygosity across loci (gene diversity); F IS = inbreeding coefficient calculated in F-STAT, with 150000 randomizations, and a nominal level of significance of 1/1000. * P <0.05; ** P< 0.01; *** P<0.001; bold represents significance after correcting for multiple comparisons.