Reach timing:
|
Reach-to-grasp reactions have to be completed rapidly to |
Reaction time |
prevent a fall (i.e. fast contact time). This is achieved via |
Movement time |
early initiation (reaction time) and/or fast execution |
Contact time |
(movement time) of the reaching movement. |
Reach velocity:
|
Rapid reach velocity reduces movement time. Shorter |
Peak velocity |
time-to-peak-velocity suggests faster acceleration of the |
Time-to-peak-velocity |
reaching hand, whereas longer time-after-peak-velocity |
Time-after-peak-velocity |
allows more time for correction of the reach trajectory. |
Reach trajectory:
|
Transporting the hand along a shorter path-of-travel (i.e. |
Medio-lateral deviation from the “direct-path” |
with less deviation from the direct (straight-line path) in |
Maximum vertical hand elevation |
the horizontal plane and with lower elevation in the |
Maximum lateral deviation from the “direct-path” |
vertical plane) is more efficient but requires more |
|
accurate mapping of the final target position. |
Reach accuracy:
|
Reach accuracy is important especially if the graspable |
Hand contact position in all three axes |
object is small. Both systematic and variable errors |
Variability of hand contact position in all three axes |
reflect the accuracy with which the target was encoded, |
|
stored and retrieved from working memory. |
Prehension (grasp formation):
|
Accurate prehension (i.e. achieving a full grasp without |
Frequency of full grasp |
colliding with the handhold) provides a stable support |
Frequency of hand-handhold collision |
and anchor to restore postural equilibrium. |
Cognitive-task performance:
|
Impaired cognitive-task performance during the balance |
Cognitive-task error rate (dual-task trials relative to |
task suggests that both tasks competed for the same |
single-task trials) |
cognitive resources, and that the combined demands of |
|
the two tasks exceeded the available capacity. |