Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Jul 29;39(5):1161–1170. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24266

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Histograms of the results of the radiological evaluation for the thigh and calf studies. Categories I – III are defined in Table 2. In Categories I and III, the null hypothesis of “no improvement” was rejected in a statistically significant way, showing that images reconstructed with vascular masking have a radiological improvement compared to images reconstructed with conventional masking. In Category II, there was no significant loss of vessels due to masking.