Table 4. Mean (SD) IGT Net Advantageous Selections and Infrequent Punishment Bias Scores by WM Load, Group, and Gender.
| Control | SubDep | SubDep+HCCD | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
| Net advantageous selectionsa, b | No Load | 32.38 (35.31) | 26.98 (28.26) | 28.17 (40.47) | 16.82 (36.08) | 12.62 (41.51) | 34.36 (23.42) |
| Load | 15.10 (41.82) | 21.35 (31.54) | 25.25 (37.94) | 10.27 (29.90) | 14.64 (38.26) | -6.62 (30.38) | |
| Infrequent punishment bias scorec | No Load | -9.19 (40.17) | 3.12 (26.82) | -0.94 (40.12) | -1.71 (29.93) | 0.38 (29.93) | -5.27 (27.59) |
| Load | 6.26 (34.39) | 9.40 (27.22) | 14.20 (41.94) | 11.73 (29.51) | 12.09 (29.73) | 4.92 (20.39) | |
| Infrequent punishment bias – advantageous decksd | No Load | -11.00 (40.68) | 1.15 (27.30) | -8.38 (36.29) | -2.47 (23.61) | -6.08 (19.40) | -6.09 (31.64) |
| Load | 0.06 (30.81) | 5.47 (22.97) | 7.08 (38.23) | 11.84 (25.47) | 10.14 (27.73) | 2.54 (13.10) | |
| Infrequent punishment bias – disadvantageous decks | No Load | 1.81 (10.01) | 1.98 (8.37) | 7.45 (14.17) | 0.76 (13.20) | 6.46 (17.77) | 0.82 (7.59) |
| Load | 6.19 (17.36) | 3.93 (11.90) | 7.13 (13.75) | -0.11 (11.29) | 1.95 (12.63) | 2.38 (13.88) | |
Note. SubDep = Substance dependent group, SubDep+HCCD = Substance Dependent + a history of childhood conduct disorder group
a
Significant main effect of WM Load, p = .003.
b
Significant WM Load × Group × Gender interaction, p = .038.
c
Significant main effect of WM Load, p < .001.
d
Significant main effect of WM Load, p < .001.