Table 5.
Schmid-Leiman Transformation of the Second-order CFA Model Estimates*
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Item | First-order Factor Loading |
Second-order Factor Loading |
Total Variance** Explained by Factors (A2) |
Item Variance** Explained by Second- order Factor (A*B)2 |
SQRT of Unexplained Variance of First-order Factor |
Residualized First-order Factor Loading (A*E) |
Item Variance** Explained by First- order Factor (F2) |
Item Variance** Not Explained by Factors [1-(D+G)] |
SOM | ||||||||
Y1 | 0.77 | 0.91 | 0.59 | 0.49 | 0.41 | 0.32 | 0.10 | 0.41 |
Y4 | 0.84 | 0.91 | 0.71 | 0.58 | 0.41 | 0.34 | 0.12 | 0.30 |
Y7 | 0.66 | 0.91 | 0.44 | 0.36 | 0.41 | 0.27 | 0.07 | 0.57 |
Y10 | 0.99 | 0.91 | 0.98 | 0.82 | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.17 | 0.01 |
Y13 | 0.95 | 0.91 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.41 | 0.39 | 0.15 | 0.10 |
Y16 | 0.85 | 0.91 | 0.72 | 0.60 | 0.41 | 0.35 | 0.12 | 0.28 |
DEP | ||||||||
Y5 | 0.81 | 0.97 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.24 | 0.19 | 0.04 | 0.34 |
Y2 | 0.81 | 0.97 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.24 | 0.19 | 0.04 | 0.34 |
Y8 | 0.86 | 0.97 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.24 | 0.21 | 0.04 | 0.26 |
Y11 | 0.91 | 0.97 | 0.83 | 0.78 | 0.24 | 0.22 | 0.05 | 0.17 |
Y14 | 0.83 | 0.97 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.24 | 0.20 | 0.04 | 0.31 |
Y17 | 0.85 | 0.97 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.24 | 0.20 | 0.04 | 0.28 |
ANX | ||||||||
Y3 | 0.90 | 0.98 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 0.03 | 0.19 |
Y6 | 0.91 | 0.98 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 0.03 | 0.17 |
Y9 | 0.86 | 0.98 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.20 | 0.17 | 0.03 | 0.26 |
Y12 | 0.88 | 0.98 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 0.03 | 0.23 |
Y15 | 0.83 | 0.98 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.20 | 0.17 | 0.03 | 0.31 |
Y18 | 0.91 | 0.98 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 0.03 | 0.17 |
Note.
Results are based on completely standardized solution.
The variance of the unobserved continuous response variables y*.