Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Med. 2013 Jan 9;43(9):10.1017/S0033291712002978. doi: 10.1017/S0033291712002978

Table 2. Parameter estimates for the common pathway model (whole sample).

Latent factor Parent Teacher Self
F 0.72 (0.69–0.75) 0.46 (0.44–0.49) 0.63 (0.60–0.66)
A2 0.34 (0.13–0.56)
D2 0.49 (0.28–0.71)
E2 0.16 (0.14–0.19)
a2 0.36 (0.32–0.39) 0.43 (0.43–0.47) 0.16 (0.12–0.19)
e2 0.12 (0.10–0.14) 0.36 (0.36–0.49) 0.45 (0.42–0.45)
b −0.04 (−0.06 to −0.02)
Proportion of phenotypic variance (%)
Parent Teacher Self
Common A 18 7 13
Common D 25 10 19
Common E 8 3 6
Residual a 36 43 16
Residual e 12 36 45

F is the loading of each informant rating onto the latent factor; A2, D2 and E2 are standardized components of variance for latent factor; a2 and e2 are standardized components of variance unique to each informant rating; b is the rater contrast effect unique to parent ratings; the lower section of the table gives the proportion of phenotypic variance explained by common/residual genetic (A/a, D) and non-shared environmental (E/e) factors for each informant, where the proportion of variance from the common factor is calculated as the factor loading multiplied by the standardized parameter estimate multiplied by the factor loading (i.e. Common A = F × A2 × F); 95 % confidence intervals in parentheses.