Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 21;9:216. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-216

Table 7.

Likelihood of identifying resistance among NTSEC isolates cultured from feces collected as composite pen floor samples or as individual samples collected per rectum on the same sampling days1,2

Resistance outcome3 Type of fecal sample OR4 95% CI5 P-value
Ampicillin
Individual
0.8
0.3 – 1.8
0.58
 
Composite
Reference
 
 
Chloramphenicol
Individual
0.9
0.4 – 2.5
0.94
 
Composite
Reference
 
 
Kanamycin
Individual
0.6
0.2 – 2.5
0.5
 
Composite
Reference
 
 
Nalidixic Acid
Individual
3.5
0.3 – 44.8
0.41
 
Composite
Reference
 
 
Streptomycin
Individual
1.3
0.8 – 2.2
0.31
 
Composite
Reference
 
 
Sulfisoxazole
Individual
1.2
0.7 – 2.2
0.5
 
Composite
Reference
 
 
Tetracycline
Individual
0.9
0.6 – 1.7
0.92
 
Composite
Reference
 
 
Trimethoprim- Sulfamethoxazole Individual
1.7
0.4 – 8.5
0.5
Composite Reference    

1n=412 isolates recovered from 137 fecal samples collected from individual cattle, and n=198 isolates recovered from 40 composite pen floor fecal samples.

2Susceptibility testing was performed using broth microdilution.

3Other drugs could not be analyzed because of low resistance prevalence (amikacin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, cefoxitin, ceftiofur, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and nalidixic acid).

4 Odds Ratio. Analyses controlled for potential lack of independence related to repeated measures and hierarchical data structure using generalized estimating equations.

595% confidence intervals.