Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 6.
Published in final edited form as: Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2010 Sep 30;103(0):10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2010.09.014. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2010.09.014

Table 2.

Closest point distances for the six clinical cases reported herein. Patients 1 and 2 underwent partial hepatectomies at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Patients 3, 4, 5 and 6 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer center and Patients 7 and 8 at University of Florida, Gainesville Medical Center. Column 1 reports the closest point distances between the un-deformed pre-operative surface and the rigidly registered intra-operative surface and Column 2 reports the closest point distances between the surface deformed using model predictions and the rigidly registered intra-operative surface. Mean ± Standard deviation (maximum) of the values have been reported in ‘mm’ units.

Post-wICP Post-Model
Patient 1 7.2 ± 5.2 (19.2) 3.1 ± 1.8 (11.0)
Patient 2 3.9 ± 2.6 (11.4) 3.0 ± 3.2 (23.1)
Patient 3 6.2 ± 4.2 (17.4) 2.5 ± 1.3 (7.5)
Patient 4 5.0 ± 2.7 (9.8) 1.9 ± 0.8 (4.0)
Patient 5 3.6 ± 1.8 (8.2) 1.8 ± 0.7 (5.0)
Patient 6 8.8 ± 4.4 (14.2) 3.6 ± 2.0 (10.1)
Patient 7 4.2 ± 2.5 (11.8) 2.8 ± 2.5 (12.3)
Patient 8 5.0 ± 3.1 (11.7) 1.8 ± 1.0 (5.6)