Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 29;11:181. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-181

Table 4.

Evaluation of chances for good and bad self-rated quality of life of elderly people applying for social help – multi-factor logistic regression

Variable Good vs. bad, neither good nor bad
OR 95% CI p
Education
University
3.07
1.21–7.80
p < 0.05
Secondary
1.27
0.68–2.37
p > 0.05
Vocational
0.91
0.30–2.80
p > 0.05
Elementary
1.00
Reference group
Sufficient income
Yes
1.42
0.81–2.50
p > 0.05
No
1.00
Reference group
Kind of help
Financial
0.89
0.28–2.81
p > 0.05
Nursing
1.00
Reference group
Headaches
No
1.59
0.83–2.96
p > 0.05
Yes
1.00
Reference group
Pain in the chest
No
1.04
0.18–6.06
p > 0.05
Yes
1.00
Reference group
Shortness of breath
No
1.04
0.18–6.06
p > 0.05
Yes
1.00
Reference group
Heart palpitations
No
0.67
0.18–2.41
p > 0.05
Yes
1.00
Reference group
Unstable blood pressure
No
3.34
1.08–13.3
p > 0.05
Yes
1.00
Reference group
Tiredness
No
2.22
0.33–14.8
p > 0.05
Yes
1.00
Reference group
Participation in family gatherings
Yes
2.26
2.24–4.11
p < 0.01
No
1.00
Reference group
ADL
Fitness
0.56
0.23–1.35
p > 0.05
Moderate disability
0.63
0.26–1.49
p > 0.05
Disability
1.00
Reference group
GSOD No depression
10.2
4.93–21.1
p < 0.001
Diagnosed/not diagnosed depression
7.02
3.51–14.0
p < 0.001
Possible depression 1.00 Reference group

Source: the authors’ own calculations.