Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Proteomics. 2013 Apr 27;13(0):10.1002/pmic.201200402. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201200402

Table 1.

Proteomic changes in tomato leaves after Pseudomonas infection between different time points (4hai and 24hai) and genotypes (PtoR and prf3).

Expression pattern Time point comparisons Genotype comparisons
Component 1a Component 2a PtoR_4hai
PtoR_24hai
prf3_4hai
prf3_24hai
PtoR_4hai
prf3_4hai
PtoR_24hai
prf3_24hai
- 77b (20.3)c 112 (45.9) 114 (41.1) 217 (61.1)
94 (24.7) 27 (11.1) 88 (31.8) 65 (18.3)
- 161 (42.4) 58 (23.8) 48 (17.3) 17 (4.8)
- 15 (3.9) 22 (9.0) 5 (1.8) 13 (3.7)
- 5 (1.3) 4 (1.6) 17 (6.1) 23 (6.5)
1 (0.3) 1 (0.4) 0 (0.0) 5 (1.4)
13 (3.4) 19 (7.8) 1 (0.4) 14 (3.9)
14 (3.7) 1 (0.4) 4 (1.4) 1 (0.3)
380 (100) 244 (100) 277 (100) 355 (100)
a

Component in the analysis being examined and trend in expression being examined (↑ increased; ↓ decreased, - not detected). In each comparison, component 1 is listed first, and component 2 is listed second.

b

Number of proteins

c

Percent of the total proteins identified.