. 2013 Oct 28;13:446. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-446

Table 4.

Regression results of group size and quality of care

Dependant variable	Access	Comp-ness	Continuity	CDM	Disease prevention	Health promotion
Logarithm (FP)	0.01169^**	0.097^***	−0.02246^***	−0.0198	0.03282^*	0.00793
Patient = female	0.01868^***		0.012622^**	−0.07747^**	0.1886^***	−0.02027^**
Patient Age	0.00089^***		0.001019^***	0.00326^***	−0.00392^***	−0.00107^***
Chronic disease			0.03396^***		−0.04204^*	0.02832^***
Selfhealth > fair	0.0302^***
% of Female FPs					0.08214^***	0.06529^***
% of Canadian educated FPs	0.0708^***		0.025236^*		−0.04379^*
Years since grad (FPs)	0.0015^***		0.000883^**			−0.001955^***
Rurality Index	−0.00073^***		−0.00024^*		−0.00142^***
# NP			−0.00814^***		−0.04123^***
Other HP Exist		0.014^***
other Hospital >10 km	0.0518^***	0.115^***	−0.013502^**
EMR					0.034216^*
Model (CHC ref)
FFS	−0.0219^***	0.036	−0.01108	−0.13955^***	−0.16369^***	−0.01945^*
FHN	0.000344	0.03	−0.01636	−0.14324^***	−0.05882	0.003011
HSO	0.0614^***	0.009	0.012943	−0.10884^**	−0.20511^***	−0.003897
Constant	0.5659^***	0.476^***	0.783532^***	0.58627^***	0.80894^***	0.26988^***
R²		0.634
# cases	3392	84	3392	2640	2640	3392

Comp-ness, Comprehensiveness; NP, Nurse practitioner; ^*indicates significance at the p < 0.10 level, ^**indicates significance at the p < 0.05 level, ^***indicates significance at the p < 0.01 level.