Table 4.
Comparison results with other methods
| TN | FN | TP | FP | Negative precision | Positive precision | Ac | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ProA-RF |
136 |
30 |
154 |
34 |
0.8193 |
0.8191 |
0.8192 |
| ProA-SVM |
136 |
40 |
144 |
34 |
0.7727 |
0.8090 |
0.7910 |
| ZYGGREGATOR |
136 |
45 |
139 |
34 |
0.7514 |
0.8035 |
0.7768 |
| AAGRESCAN |
136 |
61 |
123 |
34 |
0.6904 |
0.7834 |
0.7316 |
| FoldAmyloid |
136 |
68 |
116 |
34 |
0.6667 |
0.7733 |
0.7119 |
| TANGO |
136 |
86 |
98 |
34 |
0.6126 |
0.7424 |
0.6610 |
| PAGE | 136 | 88 | 96 | 34 | 0.6071 | 0.7385 | 0.6554 |
TP: the number of True Positive samples; FN: the number of False Negative samples; FP: the number of false positive samples and TP: the number of true positive samples. Ac: Accuracy.