Table IV.
Unclassified∗ | Erosive OA | Generalised hand OA | IPJ and thumb base OA | Thumb base OA | Nodal IPJ OA | Non-nodal IPJ OA | Difference between the groups (ANOVA) significance | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUSCAN Pain (0–20), mean (95% CI) | 6.3 (5.9, 6.8) | 7.6 (6.4, 8.7) | 7.0 (6.4, 7.7) | 6.6 (5.7, 7.5) | 6.7 (6.1, 7.3) | 6.9 (6.0, 7.8) | 6.7 (5.6, 7.8) | P = 0.408 |
AUSCAN Function (0–36), mean (95% CI) | 9.4 (8.5, 10.3) | 13.3 (11.1, 15.5) | 11.7 (10.4, 12.9) | 10.4 (8.6, 12.1) | 10.8 (9.7, 11.9) | 10.1 (8.4, 11.9) | 9.9 (7.8, 12.0) | P = 0.013 |
Grip strength in lbs., mean (95% CI) | 59.1 (56.5, 61.8) | 35.6 (28.6, 42.6) | 45.0 (41.1, 49.0) | 47.6 (42.4, 52.8) | 52.3 (49.1, 55.6) | 49.3 (43.7, 54.9) | 54.5 (47.9, 61.1) | P < 0.001 |
Pinch strength in lbs., mean (95% CI) | 11.8 (11.7, 12.2) | 8.2 (7.1, 9.3) | 9.6 (8.9, 10.2) | 9.7 (8.9, 10.5) | 10.4 (9.9, 10.9) | 10.5 (9.6, 11.4) | 10.3 (9.3, 11.4) | P < 0.001 |
MHQ Appearance subscale (0–100), mean (95% CI) | 75.3 (73.0, 77.6) | 51.2 (45.4, 57.1) | 68.2 (64.9, 71.6) | 70.2 (65.7, 74.6) | 75.3 (72.5, 78.1) | 69.1 (64.4, 73.8) | 66.4 (60.7, 72.1) | P < 0.001 |
Analysis was completed on CASHA and CASK study participants using mutually exclusive subsets as determined in Fig. 1; Data are marginal means and 95% CIs estimated from the ANOVA model.
Individuals in this sub-group are symptomatic with pain in the last month and may have some radiographic changes, but they do not meet the criteria for any of the hand OA subsets. AUSCAN, Australian/Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index; data was missing for the following characteristics: AUSCAN Pain n = 130 (12.1%), AUSCAN Function n = 121 (11.2%), grip strength n = 10 (0.9%), pinch strength n = 20 (1.9%) and MHQ Appearance subscale n = 164 (15.2%).