Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct;43(2):195–203. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2013.04.010

Table 3.

Accuracy of knee injection: influence of site and image-guidance—Relative and absolute risk difference*

Knee injection site Relative risk (95% confidence Interval) Absolute risk difference (95% confidence interval) Chi squared2, p-value
Medial midpatellar (guided vs blind) 1.34 (1.15–1.57) 0.22 (0.10–0.33) 12.17, p = 0.0005
Superomedial patellar (guided vs blind) 1.22 (1.16–1.27) 0.18 (0.14–0.22) 72.03, p < 0.0001
Anterolateral joint line (guided vs blind) 1.39 (1.27–1.53) 0.28 (0.20–0.35) 30.03, p < 0.0001
Lateral midpatellar (guided vs blind) 1.14 (1.04–1.26) 0.12 (0.001–0.20) 3.91, p = 0.05
Superolateral patellar (guided vs blind) 1.15 (1.10–1.21) 0.13 (0.10–0.18) 14.73, p = 0.0001
Lateral suprapatellar bursa (guided vs blind) 1.18 (1.07–1.32) 0.15 (0.08–0.26) 35.44, p < 0.0001
Medial knee injections as a group (guided vs blind) 1.27 (1.21–1.32) 0.21 (0.17–0.24) 92.13, p < 0.0001
Lateral knee injections as a group (guided vs blind) 1.22 (1.17–1.26) 0.17 (0.14–0.20) 101.48, p < 0.0001
Guided vs Blinded injections as a group 1.24 (1.21–1.27) 0.19 (0.17–0.21) 124.54, p < 0.0001
Blinded knee injections: lateral vs medial as a group 1.05 (1.00–1.12) 0.04 (0.00–0.08) 3.75, p = 0.05
Guided knee injections: lateral vs medial as a group 1.01 (0.99–1.03) 0.01 (−0.01 to 0.03) 1.29, p = 0.3

Relative risk is the proportionate difference in accuracy of injections (between groups as defined in each row) while absolute risk difference is the absolute difference in accuracy.