Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 7.
Published in final edited form as: Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2009 Oct-Dec;10(0):10.3109/17482960802709416. doi: 10.3109/17482960802709416

Figure 1.

Figure 1

ALSFRS over time for each of the 19 subjects in the study that had at least one post-baseline measurement for this parameter.

ALSFRS at baseline: mean of 34.5, range. 30–40.
Month Mean changes
from baseline
P
(t-test)
p (Signed Wil-
coxon)
3 −4.7
(95% CI: −6.9, −2.5)
0.0003 0.0006
6 −9.6
(95% CI: −16.0, −3.1)
0.011 0.016
9 −7.3
(95% CI: −16.7, +2.2)
0.093 0.125
In topiramate controls:
Month Mean changes
    from baseline
3 −2.2±0.2
6 −5.0±0.5
9 −6.5±0.5
The mean decline per month was 1.2 (95% CI 0.7–1.7). By contrast, among the 279 1 control subjects (mean of 30 at baseline, range 7–40) with at least one post-baseline measurement the mean decline per month was 1.0 (95% CI 0.9–1.1). This was not a significant difference in the rate of decline between the thalidomide and control groups (p= 0.2). Linear mixed effects model used with random intercept and slope for each subject. Conclusion: Thalidomide subjects experienced greater declines in ALSFRS. These declines were greater but not significantly so than control subjects in the topiramate clinical trial (27).