. 2012 Oct 23;2012:917540. doi: 10.6064/2012/917540

Table 8.

Evaluating statistical significance of individual sites by two types of false discovery rate.

Site	p	pBH⁽¹⁾	pBY⁽²⁾
6	*0.0000000000^†	0.002941	0.000855
10	*0.0000000000^†	0.005882	0.001710
7	*0.0000000000^†	0.008824	0.002565
11	*0.0000000000^†	0.011765	0.003420
8	*0.0000000000^†	0.014706	0.004276
9	*0.0000000000^†	0.017647	0.005131
12	*0.0000000000^†	0.020588	0.005986
4	*0.0000004842^†	0.023529	0.006841
3	*0.0000013734^†	0.026471	0.007696
5	*0.0000030965^†	0.029412	0.008551
14	*0.0002619304^†	0.032353	0.009406
15	*0.0006307900^†	0.035294	0.010261
17	*0.0025004071^†	0.038235	0.011116
16	*0.0033589734^†	0.041176	0.011971
13	*0.0084455695^†	0.044118	0.012827
1	*0.0177349476	0.047059	0.013682
2	*0.0182291629	0.050000	0.014537

⁽¹⁾Critical p based on Benjamini and Hochberg (1995) [103].

⁽²⁾Critical p based on Benjamini and Yekutieli (2001) [104].

*Significant by the criterion in Benjamini and Hochberg (1995) [103].

^†Significant by the criterion in Benjamini and Yekutieli (2001) [104].