Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2013 Sep;34(7):10.1097/DBP.0b013e31829d211c. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e31829d211c

Table 4.

Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of some subsets of TQ among 1 -year-old Beninese children.

Cut-off 1: Mean minus 1 SD Gross Motor Composite score

Sea Spb PPVc NPV d Se Sp PPV NPV
Positive at TQ1 46.0 83.0 49.0 81.0 40.7 78.5 25.3 88.1
(35.8–56.9) e (78.1–87.5) (38.5–60.4) (76.2–85.8) (27.6–55) (73.4–83) (16.6–35.7) (83.6–91.7)
Positive at TQ5 17.0 94.0 50.0 76.0 22.2 93.4 37.5 87.0
(10.2–26.4) (90.3–96.5) (31.9–68.1) (71.1–80.7) (12–35.6) (90–95.9) (21.1–56.3) (82.9–90.5)
Positive on TQ1 OR positive on TQ5 47.3 80.5 46.3 81.2 42.6 76.2 24.2 88.1
(36.9–57.9) (75.2–85.1) (36–56.8) (75.9–85.7) (29.2–56.8) (70.9–80.9) (16–34.1) (83.6–91.8)
Positive on at least 1 of the 9 questions 80.6 31.3 29.4 82 81.5 30.1 17.3 90.1
(71.1–88.1) g (25.7–37.3) (23.9–35.4) (73.1–89) (68.6–90.7) (25–35.7) (12.8–22.5) (82.5–95.1)
Cut-off 2: Mean minus 2 SD Gross Motor Composite score

Se c Sp d PPV e NPV f Se Sp PPV NPV
Positive on TQ1 76.5 78.0 15.0 99.0 66.7 76.7 6.9 98.8
(50.1–93.2) (73.3–82.4) (8.2–24.2) (96.2–99.6) (29.9–92.5) (71.8–81) (2.6–14.4) (96.8–99.8)
Positive on TQ5 47.1 92.9 25.0 97.2 44.4 91.9 12.5 98.5
(23–72.2) (89.6–95.4) (11.5–43.4) (94.8–98.7) (13.7–78.8) (88.5–94.6) (3.5–29) (96.4–99.5)
Positive on TQ1 OR positive on TQ5 76.5 75.7 13.7 98.5 77.8 74.6 7.4 99.2
(50.1–93.2) (70.8–80.2) (7.49–22.3) (96.1–99.6) (40–97.2) (69.7–79.1) (3.0–14.6) (97.3–99.9)
Positive on at least 1 of the 9 questions 100 29.6 6.7 100 100 29.1 3.5 100
(80.5–100) (24.8–34.8) (3.93–10.5) (96.4–100) (66.4–100) (24.4–34.2) (1.63–6.59) (96.4–100)
a

Sensitivity

b

Specificity

c

Positive predictive value

d

Negative predictive value

e

Confidence interval