Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 14;14(10):20340–20358. doi: 10.3390/ijms141020340

Table 1.

Summary of results of FCS studies on five red FPs and mCerulean3.

Flickering threshold (kW/cm2) Optimal power (kW/cm2) D in soln (μm2/s) D in live cells (μm2/s) D FP-BZip in cytosol (μm2/s) D FP-BZip in nucleus (μm2/s) Brightness published (a.u.) [ref] Mb (FPs in live cells) Mb (FP-BZip live cells)
mCherry 0.39 0.11 96.6 ± 8.1 30.0 ± 3.1 21.1 ± 8.5 8.6 ± 2.2 2.62 [6] 2.0 ± 0.2 1.65
mApple -- 0.075 122.2 ± 7.5 37.8 ± 8.5 27.4 ± 7.3 14.2 ± 4.0 6.06 [11] 5.6 ± 1.6a n.d.
TagRFP-T 0.91 0.10–0.13 89.9 ± 8.0 26.6 ± 3.9 23.9 ± 4.6 7.9 ± 1.8 8.02 [13] 13.4 ± 2.5 9.8 ± 1.9
mRuby2 0.41 0.17 96.2 ± 5.6 19.1 ± 3.6 24.6 ± 4.4 9.7 ± 2.7 7.04 [9] 6.8 ± 1.6 7.0 ± 0.9
FusionRed 0.11 0.11 93.0 ± 13.7 33.2 ± 6.8 n.d. n.d. 2.95 [8] 2.7 ± 0.6 n.d.
mCerulean3 n.d. n.d. 92.5 ± 8.5 29.3 ± 4.4 22.6 ± 5.8 7.3 ± 2.6 n.d. n.d. n.d.
a

Autocorrelation fitting for mApple did not provide an accurate value for D using a one-component fit; Therefore, data were fit using a diffusion model in which N was determined by including a flickering component and setting D equal to DmCherry (see Section 3.2 and Equation (4)).