Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 7.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Med Biol. 2013 Sep 7;58(17):10.1088/0031-9155/58/17/6225. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/17/6225

Table 2.

RMSE of different filtering methods on whole image (FOV) and five uniform tumors. The best value is indicated in boldface. Filters are applied to estimated image at 100 iterations if not indicated.

Post-recon. Filter RMSE (tumor volume)
FOV (9 cc) (16 cc) (32 cc) (113 cc) (177 cc)
None @ 24 iter. 0.335 0.410 0.325 0.312 0.307 0.204
None @ 100 iter. 0.445 0.317 0.342 0.355 0.276 0.236

NLM without CT @ 24 iter. 0.315 0.415 0.327 0.314 0.308 0.202
NLM without CT 0.311 0.375 0.367 0.367 0.264 0.202
Gaussian 0.363 0.342 0.306 0.294 0.249 0.187

NLM w. true weight 0.241 0.297 0.277 0.254 0.197 0.127

NLM CT-B 0.267 0.417 0.366 0.346 0.233 0.167
NLM CT-M 0.288 0.403 0.359 0.321 0.240 0.167
NLM CT-S 0.293 0.291 0.264 0.318 0.191 0.156
NLM CT-H 0.265 0.320 0.280 0.319 0.196 0.151

NLM CT-B w. 3.4mm misreg. CT 0.275 0.416 0.373 0.350 0.238 0.170
NLM CT-M w. 3.4mm misreg. CT 0.290 0.405 0.365 0.322 0.242 0.169
NLM CT-S w. 3.4mm misreg. CT 0.292 0.328 0.279 0.310 0.189 0.155
NLM CT-H w. 3.4mm misreg. CT 0.270 0.347 0.291 0.314 0.192 0.150

NLM CT-B w. 6.8mm misreg. CT 0.290 0.423 0.384 0.362 0.244 0.175
NLM CT-M w. 6.8mm misreg. CT 0.297 0.414 0.375 0.335 0.246 0.176
NLM CT-S w. 6.8mm misreg. CT 0.293 0.443 0.320 0.297 0.191 0.156
NLM CT-H w. 6.8mm misreg. CT 0.282 0.449 0.327 0.305 0.192 0.150