Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec;2(4):299–305. doi: 10.1177/2048872613501986

Table 2.

Interruption of intravenous sedating medications.

Variable PRE (n=98) POST (n=100) p-value
DI completed, n (%) 283 (49.3) 254 (58.4) <0.01
Opportunities for DI that were not completeda 235 179
Reasons for no DI, n (%)
Hemodynamic instability 58 (24.7) 27 (15) 0.02
Planned surgery/procedure 28 (11.9) 37 (20.5) 0.02
Ventilatory dyssynchrony 8 (3.4) 22 (12.2) <0.01
RASS goal <–2 27 (11.5) 27 (13.3) 0.35
Comfort measures/deceased 15 (6.4) 12 (6.7) 0.89
Sedation initiated <12 h 53 (22.6) 34 (18.9) 0.45
Active ischemia 7 (3) 1 (0.6) 0.15
Alcohol withdrawal 3 (1.3) 7 (3.9) 0.11
RASS currently >–1/agitation 36 (15.3) 11 (6.1) <0.01
Active seizures 0 (0) 1 (0.6) 0.81

DI: drug interruption; POST: post-pathway implementation; PRE: prior to pathway implementation; RASS: Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale.

a

Restricted to analysis of instances where the reason for not completing sedating DI was recorded. The % for DI completed is among the total opportunities for DI. The reasons (%) are among opportunities for DI that were not completed and the reason was known. Reasons for deferring DI were unknown in 59 ‘opportunities’ PRE and 0 POST.