Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Assess. 2013 May 6;25(3):10.1037/a0032542. doi: 10.1037/a0032542

Table 3.

Evaluation of Measurement Invariance by Limb of the BAC and Beverage Condition

LEVEL OF M.I. ESTABLISHED BAC LIMB (Ascending vs. Descending) BEVERAGE CONDITION (Placebo vs. Alcohol)
MODEL FIT INDICES MODEL FIT INDICES


CFI TLI RMSEA SRMR CFI TLI RMSEA SRMR
Configural Invariance .966 .956 .054 .054 .958 .946 .058 .059

Metric Invariance

 Step 1. Model Fit .964 .957 .053 .058 .958 .950 .056 .064
 Step 2. Δ in Fit from Configural Model −.002 .001 −.001 .004 .000 .004 −.002 .005

Scalar Invariance

 Step 1. Model Fit .947 .940 .060 .058 .947 .942 .061 .073
 Step 2. Δ in Fit from Metric Model −.017 −.017 .007 .000 −.011 −.008 .005 .009

Note. Abbreviations within the table are BAC = Blood Alcohol Curve; MI = Measurement Invariance; CFI = Bentler’s Comparative Fit Index; TLI = Tucker Lewis Index; RMSEA = Root Mean Square Error of Approximation; SRMR = Standardized Root Mean Square Residual.