Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 27;20(6):1082–1090. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001547

Table 3.

Classification results on dataset 1 (AUC/accuracy/sensitivity/specificity)

Features Linear discriminant analysis Support vector machine
A: Planar measurement 0.870/0.811/0.678/0.829: {1, 2} 0.860/0.798/0.668/0.815: {3}
B: 3D shape 0.954/0.919/0.941/0.916: {4, 5} 0.952/0.920/0.927/0.919: {4, 5}
C: Intensity 0.977/0.887/0.942/0.879: {9, 10, 11} 0.964/0.898/0.840/0.906: {9, 10}
A + C 0.976/0.883/0.937/0.876: {9, 10, 11} 0.964/0.919/0.906/0.922: {1, 2, 7, 10}
B + C 0.984/0.945/0.969/0.942: {4, 5, 9, 10, 11} 0.978/0.940/0.879/0.949: {4, 5, 7, 10}
A+B+C 0.984/0.942/0.975/0.937: {2, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11} 0.977/0.936/0.911/0.941: {1, 5, 6, 9, 10}

Selected features are noted in the braces (feature index corresponds to table 2), the best results are highlighted in bold.

AUC, area under the curve; 3D, three dimensional.