Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov;16(11):1403–1409. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0245

Table 3.

Responses to Questions on Current Practice in Assessment and Management of Cancer Pain

How routinely does each of these practices takes place at your primary workplace? (Most of the time/always or nearly always) (n=77)%
 Use of breakthrough opioids in cancer patients receiving long-acting opioids 99%
 Use of bowel regimens in cancer patients receiving opioids 96%
 Follow-up of pain management for cancer patients 97%
 Scheduled pain medication for severe pain 95%
 Continuity of opioid doses across health care settings 92%
 Regular pain assessment in cancer patients 91%
 Routine assessment of pain in new cancer patients 91%
 Routine pain education for cancer patients 83%
 Use of a validated pain scale to assess cancer pain 71%
How much of a barrier is each of the following at your primary workplace? (somewhat of a barrier/very substantial barrier) (n=76)%
 Difficulty accessing services that enable nonpharmacologic management of cancer pain 83%
 Lack of coordination across multiple providers 78%
 Challenges posed by comorbidities 76%
 Difficulty accessing interventional pain services 71%
 Impact of distance on ability to access pain-related services for patients 62%
 Inability to access ongoing data on pain and quality of life to monitor progress and outcomes 62%
 Lack of regular case reviews to critically discuss and evaluate pain assessment and management 58%
 Difficulty keeping abreast of advances from research 58%
 Inadequate remuneration for time spent (e.g., on multidisciplinary meetings) 54%
 Lack of benchmarks to assess improvement in quality of pain management over time 54%
 Difficulty accessing transport services for patients requiring management for cancer pain 47%
 Difficulty accessing acute pain services 47%
 Limited expertise in the assessment and management of cancer pain 30%
 Difficulty accessing palliative care services 11%
What would improve cancer pain assessment and management at your primary workplace? (Check as many as apply) (n=77)%
 More patient education 64%
 More caregiver education 62%
 More training and access to information on pain assessment and management 57%
 Increase in dedicated clinician time 55%
 One or more clinical champion(s) 42%
 A more multidisciplinary approach 39%
 New mechanisms for evaluating outcomes 18%
 Policy changes 10%
 Unsure 5%