Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov;20(11):878–891. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2013.0083

Table 2.

Performance Comparison on Dataset I and Dataset II

 
Dataset I
Dataset II
Methods Accu Sen Spe Pre CC F1 Accu Sen Spe Pre CC F1
PredHS-SVM 0.88 0.75 0.93 0.79 0.69 0.76 0.87 0.86 0.87 0.84 0.74 0.84
PredHS-Ensemble 0.82 0.85 0.81 0.60 0.60 0.69 0.87 0.91 0.84 0.80 0.74 0.85
Robetta 0.80 0.51 0.9 0.62 0.44 0.56 0.77 0.51 0.96 0.89 0.54 0.65
FOLDEF 0.78 0.31 0.93 0.59 0.31 0.40 0.70 0.31 0.98 0.91 0.41 0.46
KFC 0.79 0.55 0.87 0.58 0.43 0.57 0.74 0.55 0.87 0.75 0.45 0.64
MINERVA2 0.84 0.58 0.93 0.72 0.55 0.64 0.81 0.58 0.97 0.93 0.62 0.72
HotPoint 0.72 0.54 0.78 0.44 0.29 0.48 0.73 0.54 0.86 0.73 0.43 0.62
APIS 0.76 0.43 0.87 0.54 0.33 0.46 0.75 0.74 0.75 0.70 0.50 0.71
KFC2a 0.82 0.55 0.91 0.66 0.49 0.59 0.83 0.84 0.82 0.78 0.67 0.80
KFC2b 0.78 0.47 0.88 0.60 0.38 0.51 0.81 0.74 0.86 0.82 0.62 0.75

Six performance measures are used: accuracy (Accu), sensitivity (Sen), specificity (Spe), precision (Pre), CC, and F1 score. The highest values are highlighted in bold.