Table 3.
Multinomial Logistic Regression Predicting Group Membership
| Model 1 | Model 2 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Low-Risk (vs. Abstainers) | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| B | SE B | OR | B | SE B | OR | |
| Parental Monitoring | −.44** | .17 | .65 | −.35† | .18 | - |
| Assoc. with Delinquent Peers | .51** | .17 | 1.66 | .27 | .19 | - |
| Behavior Problems | .31† | .18 | - | .35† | .20 | - |
| Tobacco Use | .77 | .51 | - | .55 | .53 | - |
| Romantic Relationship Status | 1.05*** | .16 | 2.85 | .95** | .18 | 2.60 |
| Gender | .46 | .32 | - | .89* | .36 | 2.43 |
| Sexual Experimentation | - | - | - | .95*** | .18 | 2.59 |
|
| ||||||
| High-Risk (vs. Abstainers) | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| B | SE B | OR | B | SE B | OR | |
|
| ||||||
| Parental Monitoring | −.60* | .24 | .55 | −.55* | .26 | .58 |
| Assoc. with Delinquent Peers | .78** | .24 | 2.19 | .45† | .26 | - |
| Behavior Problems | .52* | .22 | 1.68 | .50* | .25 | 1.64 |
| Tobacco Use | 1.26* | .64 | 3.53 | .77 | .68 | - |
| Romantic Relationship Status | 1.08*** | .25 | 2.93 | .95*** | .27 | 2.58 |
| Gender | −.11 | .51 | - | .23 | .57 | - |
| Sexual Experimentation | - | - | - | 1.32*** | .34 | 3.73 |
Note. OR = Odds Ratio. All quantitative predictors were standardized before conducting the regression.
Model 1: likelihood ratio test χ2(16) = 119.17, p < .001; Nagelkerke pseudo-R2 = .39. Model 2: likelihood ratio test χ2(18) = 157.49, p < .001; Nagelkerke pseudo-R2 = 49.
†
p < .10.
*
p < .05.
**
p < .01.
***
p < .001.