Table 4.
Distribution, % of respondents | Proportion of buyers % | Phi coefficient for correlation... | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(p-value) | |||||||
Would increase purchases * | No effect on purchases | Would decrease purchases | Would not purchase | ...with Case 2 | ...with Case 3 | ||
Case 1 | 2.3 | 16.3 | 51.4 | 30.0 | 70.0 | 0.056 | 0.148 |
(Biological risk) | |||||||
(0.043) | (0.000) | ||||||
Would purchase if cheaper than conventional | Would purchase if the same price as conventional | Would purchase even if more expensive than conventional | Would not purchase | ||||
Case 2 | 7.5 | 2.9 | 0.7 | 88.9 | 11.1 | 0.361 | |
(Chemical risk) | |||||||
(0.000) | |||||||
Case 3 | 23.8 | 12.0 | 1.0 | 63.2 | 36.8 | ||
(GM-feed) |
* This option was available only for the first sub-sample, where it was described that the price would decrease by half. The column “Proportion of buyers” is the sum of the first three data columns.