Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Addict Behav. 2013 Jun 17;28(1):257–267. doi: 10.1037/a0031487

Table 3.

Item Endorsement Probabilities from Three-Class Solutions from Latent Class Analysis of Substance Use Problems (n = 199) and the Conflict Tactics Scales (n = 185)

Classes of Substance Abusers
None Soft Drugs Polysubstance
n 59 77 63
Percent of Sample 30 39 32
Substance Dependence/Abuse Items
Nicotine Dependence .30 .56 .90
Alcohol Abuse .10 .54 .69
Alcohol Dependence .08 .94 .83
Cannabis Abuse .00 .17 .78
Cannabis Dependence .04 .24 .87
Other Drug Abuse .00 .00 .67
Other Drug Dependence .02 .07 .85
Classes of Intimate Partner Aggressors
None Psych Global
n 60 85 40
Percent of Sample 32 46 22
Conflict Tactics Scales Items
Yelled/Insulted .29 .96 1.00
Sulked/Refused to Talk .55 .93 .90
Stomped Out of the Room .29 .96 .98
Threw/Smashed .00 .39 1.00
Threatened to Hit/Throw .00 .11 .90
Threw Something .00 .10 .65
Pushed/Grabbed/Shoved .00 .28 .98
Hit (or Attempt), Not with Object .00 .02 .64
Hit (or Attempt), Hard Object .02 .00 .30

Note. LCA = Latent Class Analysis; Soft Drugs = Alcohol and/or Cannabis Problem; Polysubstance = Polysubstance Abuse Problem; Psych = Psychological Aggression; Global = Global Aggression (Psychological + Physical Aggression).