Table 3.

Multiple regression analyses predicting frequency of condom use

	Beta	SE	t	p	Effect size (r)	95 % CI for B
Committed and non-committed relationships (n = 92) a
Age	0.13	0.06	2.04	0.04	0.19	[0.00, 0.25]
Ethnicity (AAb vs. all others)	0.47	0.32	1.44	0.15	0.14	[−0.18, 1.11]
Relationship status	−0.05	0.32	−0.32	<0.01	0.31	[−1.67, −0.42]
Income	−0.73	0.34	−0.13	0.04	0.20	[−1.40, −0.05]
Major	0.11	0.33	0.34	0.73	0.03	[−0.54, 0.76]
Received vaccine	0.12	0.32	0.36	0.72	0.03	[−0.52, 0.75]
Non-committed relationships only (n = 53)a
Age	0.08	0.08	−0.61	0.54	0.14	[−0.07, 0.24]
Ethnicity (AAb vs. all others)	1.00	0.38	2.63	0.01	0.35	[−0.24, 1.75]
Income	−0.68	0.43	−1.58	0.12	0.21	[−1.54, 0.19]
Major	0.17	0.42	0.40	0.69	0.05	[−0.68, 1.01]
Received vaccine	0.39	0.42	0.93	0.36	0.12	[−0.46, 1.25]

^aModel includes only respondents who reported ever having intercourse

^bAA = African American