Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Processes. 2013 Jun 7;0:4–14. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.05.015

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(A) Experimental design and observed results of Escobar and Miller (2003, Experiment 1). Group Diff. intervals assessed whether temporal intervals between cues encoded during training affected retroactive interference. (B) Experimental design and observed results of Escobar and Miller (2003, Experiment 2). Group Diff. X & A assessed whether cue durations encoded during training affected retroactive interference. (C) Experimental design and observed results of Escobar and Miller (2003, Experiment 3). Group Diff. O assessed whether outcome durations encoded during training affected retroactive interference Open rectangles and letters represent conditioned stimuli; black rectangles represent the footshock unconditioned stimulus. CR = strong conditioned responding; cr = little or no conditioned responding.