Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 11;8(11):e78605. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078605

Figure 4. Analysis of amino acid enrichment in IVIG “binding” versus “non-binding” peptides for all, the 1st degree classifiable and 1st degree unclassifiable peptides of the training set.

Figure 4

Amino acid propensities for the indicated groups were determined by dividing the frequency of amino acids in “binding” peptides (recognized by IVIG) by the frequency of amino acids in non-binding peptides. Results are sorted by decreasing epitope propensity assigned to the whole training set group. A propensity score >1 means that an amino acid is more likely to occur in the “binding” peptides, a score <1 more frequent in the “non-binding” ones, respectively. The analysis is position-independent.