Table 1. Characteristics of the included studies.
Study | Year | Nation | N | Tumor | Age | Design | Field | Index | b valuea | rb |
Sugahara [26] | 1999 | Japan | 20 | brain | Adult | prospective | 1.5 T | minADC | 1200 | −0.75 |
Gupta [20] | 2000 | USA | 18 | brain | Adult | prospective | 1.5 T | meanADC | 940 | −0.65c |
Gauvain [19] | 2001 | USA | 12 | brain | Children | retrospective | 1.5 T | meanADC | 1012 | −0.67 |
Kono [25] | 2001 | Japan | 17 | brain | Adult | retrospective | 1.5 T | meanADC | 1000 | −0.75 |
2001 | Japan | 18 | brain | Adult | retrospective | 1.5 T | meanADC | 1000 | −0.65 | |
Guo A [32] | 2002 | USA | 28 | brain | Adult | retrospective | 1.5 T | meanADC | 1000 | −0.46 |
Guo Y [14] | 2002 | China | 47 | breast | Adult | retrospective | 1.5 T | meanADC | 1000 | −0.51 |
Chen [10] | 2005 | China | 34 | brain | Adult | retrospective | 1.5 T | meanADC | 1000 | −0.52 |
Hayashida [22] | 2006 | Japan | 13 | brain | Adult | retrospective | 1.5 T | meanADC | 1000 | −0.68 |
Plank [30] | 2007 | Austria | 8 | spinal | Adult | retrospective | 1.5 T | meanADC | 700 | −0.64d |
Matoba [27] | 2007 | Japan | 9 | lung | Adult | prospective | 1.5 T | meanADC | 577 | −0.75 |
Humphries [28] | 2007 | USA | 19 | various | Children | prospective | 1.5 T | meanADC | 1000 | −0.72c |
Zelhof [15] | 2008 | UK | 38 | prostate | Adult | prospective | 3.0 T | meanADC | 500 | −0.48 |
Hatakenaka [30] | 2008 | Japan | 124 | breast | Adult | prospective | 1.5 T | meanADC | 1000 | −0.65c |
Manenti [21] | 2008 | Italy | 27 | renal | Adult | retrospective | 3.0 T | meanADC | 500 | −0.71 |
Yoshikawa [33] | 2008 | Japan | 27 | breast | Adult | retrospective | 1.5 T | meanADC | 800 | 0.05 |
Woodhams [13] | 2009 | Japan | 15 | breast | Adult | retrospective | 1.5 T | meanADC | 1500 | −0.74 |
Wang [16] | 2009 | China | 38 | prostate | Adult | retrospective | 1.5 T | meanADC | 500 | −0.63 |
Yamashita [31] | 2009 | Japan | 26 | brain | Adult | retrospective | 1.5 T | minADC | 1000 | −0.69 |
Gibbs [9] | 2009 | UK | 20 | prostate | Adult | prospective | 3.0 T | meanADC | 500 | −0.68 |
Kikuchi [11] | 2009 | Japan | 10 | brain | Adult | retrospective | 1.5 T | minADC | 1000 | −0.66 |
Jenkinson [32] | 2010 | UK | 17 | brain | Adult | retrospective | 1.5 T | both | 1000 | 0.04 |
Ellingson [18] | 2010 | USA | 17 | brain | Adult | retrospective | 1.5 T | meanADC | 1000 | −0.88c |
Barajas [23] | 2010 | USA | 18 | brain | Adult | retrospective | 1.5 T | meanADC | 1000 | −0.52 |
Kyriazi [24] | 2010 | UK | 8 | ovarian | Adult | retrospective | 1.5 T | meanADC | 1050 | −0.77 |
2010 | UK | 7 | omental | Adult | retrospective | 1.5 T | meanADC | 1050 | −0.72 | |
Wang [31] | 2011 | USA | 18 | pancreas | Adult | retrospective | 1.5 T | meanADC | 600 | −0.35 |
Goyal [12] | 2012 | India | 36 | renal | Adult | retrospective | 1.5 T | meanADC | 500 | −0.31 |
Doskaliyev [17] | 2012 | Japan | 24 | brain | Adult | retrospective | 3.0 T | meanADC | 1000 | −0.58 |
Ginat [29] | 2012 | USA | 18 | skull | Adult | retrospective | 1.5 T | meanADC | 1000 | −0.58 |
minADC = measurement of minimum ADC value, meanADC = measurement of average ADC value.
The unit of the b value is s/m2.
r = Spearman correlation coefficient.
r values were calculated based on r2 values.
The r value was calculated indirectly from the scatter diagram.