Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun;13(2):402–406. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v13i2.29

Table 2.

Characteristics of clients who experienced physical after effects following colposcopic cervical biopsy compared to those who did not

Variable Experienced physical
effects N=69(%)
No physical
effects N= 42(%)
P value
Overall age, years (mean±SD)
Parity
47.91(± 9.10) 52.94 (±7.43) 0.002
Nullipara 4(5.8) 3(7.1) 0.77
Multipara 65(95.2) 39(92.9) X2 = 0.08
Level of education
None 3(4.4) 3(7.1) 0.019
Primary 12(17.4) 16(38.1) X2=7.91
Secondary 3(4.4) 3(7.1)
Tertiary 51(73.8) 20(47.7)
Cervical Cytological abnormality
Inflammatory changes 3(5.8) 4(9.5) 0.32
ASCUS 12(18.8) 2(4.8) X2 =2.27
LGSIL 18(25.5) 16(38.1)
HGSIL 33(47.9) 20(47.6)
Interval between pap smear and
colposcopy in weeks (mean±SD)
Level of satisfaction
19.30 (±16.52) 16.50 (± 14.62) 0.35
Satisfied 63(91.3) 36(85.8) 0.55
Indifferent) 2(2.9 3(7.1) X2 =1.21
Not satisfied 4(5.8) 3(7.1)
Acceptance of repeat colposcopy and biopsy
Yes 68(98.6) 40(95.2) 0.297
No 1(1.4) 2(4.8) X2=1.09