Table 4.
Occurrence of dinucleotides nearby the extended -10 motif and -35 motif of C. jejuni promoters
| -35 motif | TG motif | -10 motif | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T | n | A | A | G | T | n | T | T | T | G | n | T | A | T | A | A | T | |
| All promoters | ||||||||||||||||||
| Promoters identified by Wösten [17] | 66 % | 57 % | 33 % | 38 % | 33 % | 85 % | 33 % | 47 % | ||||||||||
| Promoters identified in this study | 94 % | 93 % | 54 % | 16 % | 13 % | 92 % | 86 % | 89 % | ||||||||||
| TG promoters | ||||||||||||||||||
| Promoters identified by Wösten [17] | 57 % | 42 % | 28 % | 42 % | 100 % | 85 % | 42 % | 57 % | ||||||||||
| Promoters identified in this study | 84 % | 84 % | 42 % | 21 % | 100 % | 100 % | 89 % | 100 % | ||||||||||
| Non-TG promoters | ||||||||||||||||||
| Promoters identified by Wösten [17] | 71 % | 64 % | 35 % | 35 % | 0 % | 85 % | 28 % | 42 % | ||||||||||
| Promoters identified in this study | 96 % | 95 % | 56 % | 17 % | 0 % | 91 % | 85 % | 87 % | ||||||||||