Table 1.
Marker | Genotype | Patient | Control | OR (95 % CI) | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCP2 I/D | |||||
DD | 149 (57.6 %) | 94 (47.0 %) | Reference | ||
ID | 70 (27.6 %) | 82 (41.0 %) | 0.5 (0.3–0.8) | 0.003* | |
II | 38 (14.8 %) | 24 (12.0 %) | 1.3 (0.7–2.2) | 0.4 | |
D | 368 (71.6 %) | 270 (67.5 %) | Reference | ||
I | 146 (28.4 %) | 130 (32.5 %) | 1.2 (0.9–1.6) | 0.2 | |
Dominant model | |||||
DD versus II + ID | 1.2 (0.8–1.7) | 0.2 | |||
Recessive model | |||||
II versus ID + DD | 0.7 (0.45–1.3) | 0.4 | |||
Leptin-2548 G/A | |||||
GG | 90 (35.0 %) | 82 (41.0 %) | Reference | ||
GA | 99 (38.5 %) | 92 (46.0 %) | 1.2 (0.8–1.9) | 0.39 | |
AA | 68 (26.5 %) | 26 (13.0 %) | 2.0 (1.2–3.3) | 0.007* | |
G | 279 (54.3 %) | 256 (64.0 %) | Reference | ||
A | 235 (45.7 %) | 144 (36.0 %) | 1.5 (1.1–1.9) | 0.003* | |
Dominant model | |||||
GG versus GA + AA | 0.27 (0.1–0.4) | 0.001* | |||
Recessive model | |||||
AA vs. GG + GA | 1.8 (1.1–2.9) | 0.012* | |||
Ghrelin Arg51Gln | |||||
GG | 164 (63.8 %) | 142 (71.0 %) | Reference | ||
GA | 75 (29.2 %) | 53 (26.5 %) | 1.2 (0.8–1.8) | 0.33 | |
AA | 18 (7.0 %) | 5 (2.5 %) | 3.4 (1.2–7.5) | 0.02* | |
G | 403 (78.4 %) | 337 (84.3 %) | Reference | ||
A | 111 (21.6 %) | 63 (15.7 %) | 1.6 (1.1–2.1) | 0.02* | |
Dominant model | |||||
GG versus GA + AA | 0.7 (0.4–1.0) | 0.1 | |||
Recessive model | |||||
AA versus GG + GA | 2.9 (1.0–8.0) | 0.003* | |||
Ghrelin Leu72Met | |||||
CC | 178 (69.3 %) | 141 (70.5 %) | Reference | ||
CA | 51 (19.8 %) | 50 (25.0 %) | 0.8 (0.5–1.3) | 0.2 | |
AA | 28 (10.9 %) | 9 (4.5 %) | 2.5 (1.2–5.4) | 0.02* | |
C | 407 (79.2 %) | 332 (83.0 %) | Reference | ||
A | 107 (20.8 %) | 68 (17.0 %) | 1.3 (0.9–1.8) | 0.15 | |
Dominant model | |||||
CC versus CA + AA | 1.07 (0.7–1.6) | 0.75 | |||
Recessive model | |||||
AA versus CC + CA | 2.58 (1.2–5.6) | 0.01* |
Logistic regression analysis was used for comparing the genotypes