Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 8;8(6):611–621. doi: 10.1007/s12263-013-0353-7

Table 1.

Distribution of genotypes between patients and controls

Marker Genotype Patient Control OR (95 % CI) P value
UCP2 I/D
DD 149 (57.6 %) 94 (47.0 %) Reference
ID 70 (27.6 %) 82 (41.0 %) 0.5 (0.3–0.8) 0.003*
II 38 (14.8 %) 24 (12.0 %) 1.3 (0.7–2.2) 0.4
D 368 (71.6 %) 270 (67.5 %) Reference
I 146 (28.4 %) 130 (32.5 %) 1.2 (0.9–1.6) 0.2
Dominant model
DD versus II + ID 1.2 (0.8–1.7) 0.2
Recessive model
II versus ID + DD 0.7 (0.45–1.3) 0.4
Leptin-2548 G/A
GG 90 (35.0 %) 82 (41.0 %) Reference
GA 99 (38.5 %) 92 (46.0 %) 1.2 (0.8–1.9) 0.39
AA 68 (26.5 %) 26 (13.0 %) 2.0 (1.2–3.3) 0.007*
G 279 (54.3 %) 256 (64.0 %) Reference
A 235 (45.7 %) 144 (36.0 %) 1.5 (1.1–1.9) 0.003*
Dominant model
GG versus GA + AA 0.27 (0.1–0.4) 0.001*
Recessive model
AA vs. GG + GA 1.8 (1.1–2.9) 0.012*
Ghrelin Arg51Gln
GG 164 (63.8 %) 142 (71.0 %) Reference
GA 75 (29.2 %) 53 (26.5 %) 1.2 (0.8–1.8) 0.33
AA 18 (7.0 %) 5 (2.5 %) 3.4 (1.2–7.5) 0.02*
G 403 (78.4 %) 337 (84.3 %) Reference
A 111 (21.6 %) 63 (15.7 %) 1.6 (1.1–2.1) 0.02*
Dominant model
GG versus GA + AA 0.7 (0.4–1.0) 0.1
Recessive model
AA versus GG + GA 2.9 (1.0–8.0) 0.003*
Ghrelin Leu72Met
CC 178 (69.3 %) 141 (70.5 %) Reference
CA 51 (19.8 %) 50 (25.0 %) 0.8 (0.5–1.3) 0.2
AA 28 (10.9 %) 9 (4.5 %) 2.5 (1.2–5.4) 0.02*
C 407 (79.2 %) 332 (83.0 %) Reference
A 107 (20.8 %) 68 (17.0 %) 1.3 (0.9–1.8) 0.15
Dominant model
CC versus CA + AA 1.07 (0.7–1.6) 0.75
Recessive model
AA versus CC + CA 2.58 (1.2–5.6) 0.01*

Logistic regression analysis was used for comparing the genotypes