Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 15;26(6):1091–1098. doi: 10.1007/s10278-013-9593-8

Table 2.

The comparisons of performance indices and p values (chi-square test or z test) among the morphology features, the texture features, and the combined feature set

Morphology Texture Combined Morphology vs. texture (p value) Combined vs. morphology (p value) Combined vs. texture (p value)
Accuracy 84 % (58/69) 77 % (53/69) 88 % (61/69) 0.2833 0.4586 0.0724
Sensitivity 86 % (18/21) 62 % (13/21) 86 % (18/21) 0.0793 1.0000 0.0793
Specificity 83 % (40/48) 83 % (40/48) 90 % (43/48) 1.0000 0.3709 0.3709
PPV 69 % (18/26) 62 % (13/21) 78 % (18/23) 0.5982 0.4749 0.2349
NPV 93 % (40/43) 83 % (40/48) 93 % (43/46) 0.1569 0.9318 0.1261
Az 0.90 0.75 0.95 0.0703 0.2898 0.0163*

Combined feature set includes the morphology features and the texture features

*p < 0.05 (indicates a statistically significant difference)