Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 5;35(6):2283–2302. doi: 10.1007/s11357-013-9531-1

Table 6.

Linear, quadratic, and cubic regression analyses results

R 2 Adj R 2a F df P AIC Model
d-prime
Visuospatial 1-back task
Linear 0.085 0.084 138.62 1,1498 <0.001 −1323.2
Quadratic 0.090 0.089 74.29 2,1497 <0.001 −1330.4 Inline graphic
Cubic 0.091 0.089 49.68 3,1496 <0.001 −1328.9
Visuospatial 2-back task
Linear 0.211 0.211 400.69 1,1498 <0.001 −647.0
Quadratic 0.213 0.212 202.18 2,1497 <0.001 −648.1 Inline graphic
Cubic 0.214 0.212 135.52 3,1496 <0.001 −648.0
Verbal 1-back task
Linear 0.117 0.116 197.99 1,1498 <0.001 −1826.5 Y = 3.984 − 0.011
Quadratic 0.118 0.117 99.94 2,1497 <0.001 −1826.2
Cubic 0.118 0.117 66.98 3,1496 <0.001 −1825.3
Verbal 2-back task
Linear 0.212 0.211 402.60 1,1498 <0.001 −723.7
Quadratic 0.219 0.218 209.83 2,1497 <0.001 −735.3 Inline graphic
Cubic 0.219 0.217 139.82 3,1496 <0.001 −733.4
Reaction times
Visuospatial 1-back task
Linear 0.158 0.157 280.16 1,1498 <0.001 −7705.5
Quadratic 0.163 0.162 145.50 2,1497 <0.001 −7712.9 Inline graphic
Cubic 0.163 0.161 96.94 3,1496 <0.001 −77100.9
Visuospatial 2-back task
Linear 0.063 0.063 101.57 1,1498 <0.001 −7144.7
Quadratic 0.079 0.078 64.09 2,1497 <0.001 −7167.6 Inline graphic
Cubic 0.079 0.077 42.84 3,1496 <0.001 −7166.0
Verbal 1-back task
Linear 0.116 0.115 195.65 1,1498 <0.001 −7578.7
Quadratic 0.119 0.117 100.69 2,1497 <0.001 −7581.9 Inline graphic
Cubic 0.119 0.117 67.08 3,1496 <0.001 −7579.9
Verbal 2-back task
Linear 0.080 0.080 130.66 1,1498 <0.001 −7171.2
Quadratic 0.095 0.094 78.36 2,1497 <0.001 −7193.0 Inline graphic
Cubic 0.095 0.093 52.25 3,1496 <0.001 −7191.1

Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC) was used to select the best model for each variable. The models are presented in milliseconds for reaction times

aAdj R 2 (adjusted R 2)