Table 2.
US Food and Drug Administration approved targeted therapy for renal cell carcinoma.
Agent, date approved | Study design, patient population | Primary endpoint | Results |
---|---|---|---|
Sorafenib December 2005 | Randomized phase III, comparison to placebo; one prior therapy - cytokine | PFS | Median PFS 167 days versus 84 days |
HR 0.44 (0.35–0.55) | |||
Sunitinib Accelerated approval January 2006 | Two phase II studies in cytokine refractory patients | RR | 34%; 36.5% |
Regular approval February 2007 | Randomized phase III, compared with IFN; no prior therapy | PFS | Median PFS 47 weeks versus 22 weeks |
HR 0.42 (0.32–0.54) | |||
Temsirolimus May 2007 | Randomized phase III, comparison to IFN; no prior therapy; poor risk features | OS | Median OS 10.9 months versus 7.3 mo |
HR 0.73 (0.58–0.92) | |||
Everolimus March 2009 | Randomized phase III compared with placebo; progression after prior TKI | PFS | Median PFS 4.9 months versus 1.9 months |
HR 0.33 (0.25–0.43) | |||
Bevacizumab July 2009 | Randomized phase III comparing bevacizumab + IFN with IFN alone | PFS | Median PFS 8.5 months versus 5.2 months (Rini) HR 0.71 (0.61–0.83) |
No prior therapy | Median PFS 10.2 months versus 5.4 months (Escudier) | ||
HR 0.60 (0.49–0.72) | |||
OS 18 months and 19.8 months | |||
Pazopanib October 2009 | Randomized phase III comparison to placebo; prior cytokine or no prior therapy | PFS | Median PFS 9.2 months versus 4.2 months, all patients |
HR 0.46 (0.34–0.62) | |||
Median PFS 11.1 months versus 2.8 months, no prior therapy | |||
HR 0.4 (0.27–0.60) | |||
Median PFS 7.4 months versus 4.2 months, prior cytokine | |||
HR 0.54 (0.35–0.84) | |||
Axitinib January 2012 | Phase III randomized, compared with sorafenib; at least one prior therapy | PFS | Median PFS 6.7 months versus 4.7 months, all patients |
HR 0.66 (0.54–0.81), all patients | |||
OS 20.1 months axitinib; 19.2 months sorafenib | |||
HR 0.969 |
HR, hazard ratio; IFN, interferon; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; TKI, tyrosine kinase.