Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 12;11(11):e1001710. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001710

Figure 6. Decoding the population representations of clean and noisy sounds.

Figure 6

Schematic of the decoding of neural responses. For each auditory center, a decoder was trained to reconstruct the clean sound spectrogram from the population responses to the clean sounds. We then measured the performance of these decoders when reconstructing spectrograms from the responses to both clean and noisy sounds. Top row, spectrogram of a 2(20 dB SNR) and noisy (10/0/−10 dB SNR) conditions. Left column, decoder training from responses to clean sounds. Population responses are shown as neurograms: each row depicts the time-varying firing rate of a single unit in the population; rows are organized by CF. Right, reconstructed spectrograms (Inline graphic) from population responses to noisy sounds, using the same decoders as trained on the left. The similarity between the reconstructed spectrogram Inline graphic and the presented spectrogram Inline graphic is measured by Inline graphic; likewise, the similarity between Inline graphic and the original, clean spectrogram Inline graphic is measured by Inline graphic. The tendencies for the sAN decoder to produce Inline graphic-like spectrograms, and the IC and AC decoders to produce Inline graphic-like spectrograms, are most visible for the 0 dB and −10 dB conditions.