Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jun 19;209(5):10.1016/j.ajog.2013.06.030. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.06.030

TABLE 2.

Relationship between pregnancy history and serum homocysteine levels

Parameter Model Nulliparous Normotensive
pregnancy
HTN
pregnancy
P value
overall
P value normal
vs null
P value HTN
vs null
P value HTN
vs normal
Log
(homocysteine)
Unadjusted 2.24 ± 0.37 2.21 ± 0.32 2.24 ± 0.36 .11 .15 .88 .09
Log
(homocysteine)
Age, race, education
adjusted
2.26 ± 0.34 2.19 ± 0.30 2.25 ± 0.33 < .001 .002 .69 < .001
Log
(homocysteine)
Full 2.26 ± 0.33 2.19 ± 0.29 2.24 ± 0.33 .002 .005 .47 .015
Homocysteine
>13 μmol/L
Unadjusted 16% 11% 15% .012 .018 .74 .011
Homocysteine
>13 μmol/L
Age, race, education
adjusted
19% 11% 17% < .001 < .001 .64 < .001
Homocysteine
>13 μmol/L
Full 18% 11% 15% < .001 < .001 .34 .005

HTN, hypertensive.

First 3 rows show mean ± SD of log(homocysteine) in each pregnancy group estimated from linear regression models where serum homocysteine was analyzed as continuous variable with log transformation due to nonnormality. Three models are: unadjusted; adjusted for demographics of age, race, and education; and adjusted for demographics + smoking, HTN, log body mass index, diabetes, dyslipidemia, statins, hormone replacement therapy, family history of HTN, and coronary heart disease. Last 3 rows show proportion of women in each pregnancy group with elevated homocysteine (>13 μmol/L) estimated from logistic regression models with same 3 levels of adjustment. Accounting for sibling relationships is done using generalized estimating equations.