Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 6;471(12):3937–3944. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2884-z

Table 1.

Assessment list used for measuring the quality of the 33 studies meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria consisting of 14 domains in six different categories as proposed by Hayden et al. [18]

Category Category description Domain Domain description
A Study participation/population of interest 1 Source population clearly defined
2 Study population described (demographics)
3 Study population represents population of interest (low-velocity extremity fractures, associated injuries, hand/feet fractures excluded)
B Study attrition/followup 4 Completeness of followup described
5 Completeness of followup adequate (> 75% of study population for at least 6 months)
C Factor of interest measurement 6 Factor of interest defined in study participants to sufficiently limit potential bias (information on whether antibiotics were given)
7 Factor of interest measured appropriately (adequate information on type, duration, and route of antibiotics administration)
D Confounding factors measurement and account 8 Confounding factors described (type of gun used, type of treatment, comorbidities)
9 Confounding factors accounted for (type of gun used, type of treatment, comorbidities)
E Outcome measurement 10 Outcome measure defined
11 Outcome measured appropriately (infection rate provided)
F Results analysis 12 Analysis described
13 Analysis appropriate (information on superficial and deep infection provided separately)
14 Analysis provides sufficient presentation of data