Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 26;471(12):3922–3931. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2872-3

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

The graph shows changes in the relative percentages of indications for the second revision in first-time cup revisions reported to SHAR in 1979–2010. Infections and dislocation as causes decreased, whereas the proportion of patients with aseptic loosening increased.