. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 13.

Published in final edited form as: Hear Res. 2011 Jun 2;280(0):10.1016/j.heares.2011.05.005. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.05.005

Table 3.

A: Latencies and Amplitudes at four peak accelerations: 0.44, 0.84, 1.64, 2.75g. Iso-jerk protocol (ij) in rats.

Latency, 0dB		P1 (mean +/- sd (n), μs)
	Accel	0.44 g	0.84 g	1.64 g	2.75 g
ij	Rat	1270.62+/-24.52 (4)	1297.00 +/- 37.34 (5)	1275.00 +/- 39.68 (3)	1366.00 +/- 67.58 (5)
Latency, 0dB		N1 (mean +/- sd (n), μs)
ij	Rat	1592.50 +/- 65.89 (4)	1612.00 +/- 65.44 (5)	1615.00 +/- 91.24 (3)	^*1719.00 +/-86.63 (5)
Amplitude, 0dB		P1N1 (mean +/- sd (n), μV)
ij	Rat	0.2623 +/- 0.02300 (4)	0.2816 +/- 0.0468 (5)	0.2792 +/- 0.0481 (3)	0.2345 +/- 0.09225 (5)
B: Regressions: Iso-jerk protocol in rats: Latency and amplitude vs peak acceleration in dBre:1.0g. R² is the coefficient of determination.
Latency, 0dB		P1 (μs)
		slope (μs/dB)	Intercept (μs)	R²	p
ij	Rat	5.326	1301.90	0.296	= 0.024
		N1 (μs)
ij	Rat	7.688	1631.753	0.277	= 0.030
Amplitude		P1N1 (μV)
		slope (μV/dB)	Intercept	R²	p
ij	Rat	-0.002	0.265	0.035	= 0.474

p = 0.026