Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Optom Vis Sci. 2012 Dec;89(12):10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182772dce. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182772dce

Table 5.

Visual field deficits and unilateral visual-spatial inattention / neglect for the TBI sample, the CI subgroup and Non-CI subgroup within the TBI sample. Data are reported in terms of the percentage of the sample with the number of patients.

Visual Field Deficits

TBI % (N of 557) CI Subgroup within TBI % (N of 130) Non-CI Subgroup within TBI % (N of 427)
Right Homonymous Hemianopsia 3.8 (21) 0.8 (1) 4.7 (20)
Left Homonymous Hemianopsia 4.3 (24) 3.9 (5) 4.4 (19)
Quadrantopsia 6.1 (34) 4.6 (6) 6.6 (28)
Total 14.2 (79) 9.2 (12) 15.7 (67)

Unilateral Visual-Spatial Inattention / Neglect
TBI % (N of 557) CI Subgroup within TBI % (N of 130) Non-CI Subgroup within TBI % (N of 427)
Right Unilateral Visual-Spatial Inattention/Neglect 2.2 (12) 3.1 (4) 1.9 (8)
Left Unilateral Visual-Spatial Inattention/Neglect 5.9 (33) 6.9 (9) 5.6 (24)
Total 8.1 (45) 10.0 (13) 7.5 (32)