Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 13.
Published in final edited form as: Cognit Ther Res. 2013 Feb;37(1):10.1007/s10608-012-9437-8. doi: 10.1007/s10608-012-9437-8

Table 5.

Regression analyses testing negative cognitive style, primary control coping, secondary control coping, disengagement coping, and two-way interactions as predictors of K-SADS MDD symptoms

β sr2
DV: K-SADS MDD symptoms
Block 1: R2Δ = 0.07**
  Negative cognitive style 0.27** 0.07
Block 2: R2Δ = 0.14***
  Negative cognitive style 0.20** 0.05
  Primary control coping −0.31** 0.06
  Secondary control coping −0.28*** 0.08
  Disengagement coping −0.27** 0.04
Block 3: R2Δ = 0.05*
  Negative cognitive style 0.15* 0.03
  Primary control coping −0.29** 0.05
  Secondary control coping −0.31*** 0.10
  Disengagement coping −0.26** 0.04
  Negative cognitive style × primary
    control coping
−0.27* 0.04
  Negative cognitive style × secondary
    control coping
0.08 0.01
  Negative cognitive style × disengagement
    coping
−0.08 0.00
Final model R2 = 0.23***a

N = 165

K-SADS Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia

β, Standardized beta; sr2, semi-partial correlation squared

*

p < 0.05;

**

p < 0.01;

***

p < 0.001

a

Model values are adjusted R2