Table 2.
Violence Subgroups |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Risk Factor | Commission > Receipt | Receipt > Commission | OR (CI)a | No Violence | OR (CI)b |
Drug use | 10 (50%) | 4 (20%) | 1.5 (0.36–6.20) | 6 (30%) | 1.5 (0.66–3.57) |
Problem alcohol use | 11 (50%) | 3 (14%) | 1.1 (0.35–3.65) | 8 (36%) | 1.1 (0.55–2.42) |
Depression | 16 (46%) | 7 (20%) | 2.2 (0.54–8.81) | 12 (34%) | 1.2 (0.74–2.15) |
Perceived social support | 23 (51%) | 7 (16%) | 1.3 (0.62–3.32) | 15 (33%) | 1.3 (0.87–2.01) |
Partner drug use | 16 (54%) | 5 (19%) | 5.0 (1.30–19.2)* | 6 (27%) | 2.3 (1.05–5.06) |
Partner problem alcohol use | 8 (36%) | 6 (27%) | 2.8 (1.13–7.80) | 8 (36%) | 1.2 (0.55–2.42) |
Note: OR = odds ratios; CI = confidence interval. Problem alcohol use, drug use, and partner drug use were categorical variables (yes/no); partner problem alcohol use was a categorical variable (four or more drinks in a row); depression and perceived social support were determined by median split.
Between violence subgroups, comparing commission > receipt group to receipt > commission group; referent = receipt subgroup.
Between groups, comparing all violence group to no violence group; referent = no violence group.
p < .05.