Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 13.
Published in final edited form as: J Interpers Violence. 2009 Dec 4;25(10):10.1177/0886260509354507. doi: 10.1177/0886260509354507

Table 2.

Presence of Key Risk Factors Among Violence Subgroups (N = 45)

Violence Subgroups
Risk Factor Commission > Receipt Receipt > Commission OR (CI)a No Violence OR (CI)b
Drug use 10 (50%) 4 (20%) 1.5 (0.36–6.20) 6 (30%) 1.5 (0.66–3.57)
Problem alcohol use 11 (50%) 3 (14%) 1.1 (0.35–3.65) 8 (36%) 1.1 (0.55–2.42)
Depression 16 (46%) 7 (20%) 2.2 (0.54–8.81) 12 (34%) 1.2 (0.74–2.15)
Perceived social support 23 (51%) 7 (16%) 1.3 (0.62–3.32) 15 (33%) 1.3 (0.87–2.01)
Partner drug use 16 (54%) 5 (19%) 5.0 (1.30–19.2)* 6 (27%) 2.3 (1.05–5.06)
Partner problem alcohol use 8 (36%) 6 (27%) 2.8 (1.13–7.80) 8 (36%) 1.2 (0.55–2.42)

Note: OR = odds ratios; CI = confidence interval. Problem alcohol use, drug use, and partner drug use were categorical variables (yes/no); partner problem alcohol use was a categorical variable (four or more drinks in a row); depression and perceived social support were determined by median split.

a

Between violence subgroups, comparing commission > receipt group to receipt > commission group; referent = receipt subgroup.

b

Between groups, comparing all violence group to no violence group; referent = no violence group.

*

p < .05.