Table 6.
|
Confirmed positive RHT |
Unconfirmed positive RHT |
Unconfirmed inconclusive RHT |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Purchased cattle from: | OR | 95% CI | p-value | OR | 95% CI | p-value | OR | 95% CI | p-value |
Univariate analysis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overseas herd |
4.32 |
1.54 – 12.2 |
0.005 |
1.01 |
0.47 – 2.12 |
0.989 |
1.23 |
0.92 – 1.64 |
0.167 |
High incidence parish of England and Wales |
1.69 |
0.57 – 5.03 |
0.343 |
1.39 |
0.71 – 2.71 |
0.340 |
1.11 |
0.84 – 1.46 |
0.438 |
Low incidence parish of England and Wales |
1.38 |
0.35 – 5.45 |
0.643 |
0.21 |
0.03 – 1.57 |
0.129 |
0.62 |
0.37 – 1.06 |
0.082 |
Scottish herd classified as: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
confirmed positive RHT with high risk imports |
0.54 |
0.11 – 2.74 |
0.460 |
0.99 |
0.36 – 2.71 |
0.983 |
0.72 |
0.45 – 1.12 |
0.147 |
confirmed positive RHT with no high risk imports |
1.15 |
0.13 – 9.85 |
0.901 |
0.78 |
0.10 – 6.00 |
0.814 |
0.50 |
0.18 – 1.38 |
0.180 |
unconfirmed positive RHT with high risk imports |
0.78 |
0.22 – 2.76 |
0.700 |
1.28 |
0.59 – 2.80 |
0.531 |
1.17 |
0.85 – 1.62 |
0.331 |
unconfirmed positive RHT with no high risk imports |
0.85 |
0.21 – 3.45 |
0.820 |
0.29 |
0.66 – 1.24 |
0.094 |
0.92 |
0.62 – 1.37 |
0.683 |
unconfirmed inconclusive RHT with high risk imports |
1.92 |
0.53 – 6.95 |
0.323 |
1.79 |
0.89 – 3.62 |
0.103 |
1.39 |
1.03 – 1.80 |
0.028 |
unconfirmed inconclusive RHT with no high risk imports |
0.86 |
0.29 – 2.56 |
0.792 |
0.90 |
0.46 – 1.74 |
0.745 |
1.21 |
0.93 – 1.57 |
0.158 |
negative RHT and with high risk imports |
1.70 |
0.42 – 6.78 |
0.456 |
1.61 |
0.60 – 4.38 |
0.347 |
0.83 |
0.50 – 1.38 |
0.482 |
negative RHT with no high risk imports |
- |
- |
- |
0.88 |
0.40 – 1.93 |
0.751 |
0.85 |
0.62 – 1.16 |
0.323 |
no VETNET database entries |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1.12 |
0.64 – 1.98 |
0.702 |
Multivariate analysis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overseas herd |
4.13 |
1.47 – 11.6 |
0.002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scottish herd classified as: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unconfirmed inconclusive RHT with high risk imports | 1.35 | 1.03 – 1.78 | 0.037 |
The sample was restricted to data from 2006 to 2009. Both the univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using multinomial logistic regression models with the total number of cattle movements included as a confounding variable.