Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Marriage Fam. 2013 Jul 1;75(4):981–994. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12048

Table 1.

Descriptive Statistics for Study Variables (N = 2,940 Cases in 1,470 Sibling Dyads)

Variable M SD Range
Parent – adolescent affection 0.10 0.85 −3.20 – 1.47
Parent – adolescent association 0.02 0.78 −1.42 – 2.88
Adolescent sibling relationship quality 0.002 0.77 −2.09 – 1.04
Parent – adult offspring affection 0.01 0.78 −3.36 – 0.93
Parent – adult offspring coresidence (1 = yes) 0.41 0.49 0 – 1
Parental financial support of adult offspring (logged dollars) 5.08 3.11 0 – 8.16
Adult sibling relationship quality 0.10 0.85 −2.27 – 1.80
Sibling difference in parent – adolescent affection 0.80 0.67 0 – 4.02
Sibling difference in parent – adolescent association 0.73 0.59 0 – 3.31
Sibling difference in parent – adult offspring affection 0.66 0.61 0 – 3.45
Only one adult offspring coresides with parents (1 = yes) 0.36 0.48 0 – 1
Sibling difference in parental financial support 2.61 2.86 0 – 8.16
Age in years at the adult interview 21.95 1.72 18 – 27
Male gender (1 = yes) 0.48 0.50 0 – 1
Sibling age difference 1.44 1.50 0 – 7
Mixed-gender sibling dyad (1 = yes) 0.35 0.48 0 – 1
Hispanic (1 = yes) 0.15 0.36 0 – 1
Black (1 = yes) 0.20 0.42 0 – 1
Other non-White race (1 = yes) 0.11 0.31 0 – 1
Sibship 0.52 0.70 0 – 2
Household socioeconomic status during adolescence 0.03 0.87 −2.19 – 1.53
Parental economic hardship during adolescence (1 = yes) 0.20 0.41 0 – 1
Two-parent household during adolescence (1 = yes) 0.67 0.48 0 – 1