Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Marriage Fam. 2013 Jul 1;75(4):981–994. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12048

Table 3.

Actor – Partner Interdependence Model Coefficients Predicting Young Adult Sibling Relationship Quality From Parental Differential Treatment (N = 2,940 Cases in 1,470 Sibling Dyads)

Predictor B SE
Dyad level
 Sibling difference in parent – offspring affection −0.01 0.03
 Only one adult offspring coresides with parents −0.05 0.04
 Sibling difference in parental financial support −0.02* 0.01
 Adolescent sibling relationship quality 0.40*** 0.03
Individual level
 Parent – respondent affection 0.22*** 0.02
 Parent – respondent coresidence 0.06 0.03
 Parental financial support of respondent 0.01 0.01
 Sibling’s parent – offspring affection 0.03 0.02
 Parent – sibling coresidence −0.05 0.03
 Parental financial support of sibling −0.01 0.01
Estimated parameters 27
Deviance 6,176.45

Note: Family-level controls are race and ethnicity, sibship, household socioeconomic status, parental economic hardship, and two-parent household during adolescence (omitted from the table). Dyad-level controls are sibling age difference and sibling gender difference (omitted from the table). Individual-level controls are age and male gender (omitted from the table).

p < .10.

*

p < .05.

***

p < .001.